RE: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Tuesday conference

Title: RE: [tm-pubsubj-comment] Tuesday conference

> (from Lars-Marius)

> I feel that this discussion is becoming less and less useful, however.

> We seem to be drifting away from the subjects Thomas originally posted

> about, and those seemed to me to be the important ones. I am not sure

> how to fix this, however. 

Right, we are not talking about the "Tuesday Conference" any more - this has only been where this swarm of subjects has started.

> Thomas, could you post a new explanation of what your dissatisfaction

> with the PubSubj TC work consists of, so that we can either explain

> why you are wrong or understand where we are wrong? And please explain

> your points clearly, because I have great problems understanding what

> it is you mean and what the rationale for your criticisms is. (This is

> just a suggestion, though. If you have better suggestions for how to

> get back on track I am all ears.)

Lars-Marius, I must say: This is a discussion style I rellay like very much. We should experience more of this. We do not fight each other. I try to explain as clearly as I can - some aspects are not quite clear to me as well yet.

I will continue using separate threads - may be some of them should rather go to tm-comments instead of pubsubj. 

I am not able to start with an overall conclusion.

Thanks for your patience,

Thomas Bandholtz

CM / KM Division Manager; XML Network Moderator

Competence Center Content Management

SchlumbergerSema

http://www.schlumbergersema.com

Kaltenbornweg 3

D50679 K闤n / Cologne 

Germany

+49 221 8299 264