Eric
Thanks for your feedback.
> Thanks for publishing the notes. As a lurker, these are very helpful.
> More and more I'm convinced of a growing set of common functional
> requirements for the effective managing data on the Web.
Could you expand on that, and what you mean by "functional requirements"?
> A couple of quick questions if I may...
You are welcome :))
> Can you provide an example of what an application might get
> dereferencing a PSI. If I do an http GET on
> http://psi.fruits.org/#apple for example, what do I get back in the HTTP
> header, message body, etc.?
That's the next step. Steve Pepper should deliver an example of such an XHTML file ASAP.
> Also, the above clarification to item #3 uses 'e.g'; were other means of
> articulating formal assertions discussed? If so, how in practice do you
> anticipate supporting this requirement? (e.g. RDDL, HTTP
> content-negotiation, other?)
Well. No other means than XTM were technically discussed so far. The expression of Rec#3
only means that there is no *required* syntax for those assertions, and the door is open
to any other relevant suggestions ...
Stay tuned
Bernard
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernard Vatant
Consultant - Mondeca
www.mondeca.com
Chair - OASIS TM PubSubj Technical Committee
www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
