Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx uploaded

From
Probst, Richard <>
Date
2013-10-08T14:34:23+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx uploaded
Hi Matt,

 

Yes, the style of the SAP quote can be matched to the style adopted for use by all quotes, to improve consistency.

 

Re the “missing” edit, no problem, just wanted to make sure it wasn’t a mistake. Once all edits have been settled, please let me know and I will give the SAP
 PR folks a chance to do another review, but you have been so careful with your editing that I do not expect any concerns.

 

Best,

  --Richard

 

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Matt Rutkowski

Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 10:12 AM

To: Probst, Richard

Cc: 

Subject: RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx uploaded

 

Hiu Richard,

My thoughts against your questions...

We should use a standard way to attribute quotes. The SAP quote is attributed in the paragraph itself, while the other quotes are attributed with names appearing after the quote.
 Either way is fine, we should just pick one way. 

Agree.  As the other three are composed with the attribution at the end, would it be possible to do likewise for SAP's?  I do like the cleverness of placing it in-line in your example,
 but this seems more like a recorded/verbal quote given live to a reporter whereas published quotes usually have trailing attributes.

On the call, you edited the text that reads “…as a TOSCA service template between cloud orchestration tools and runtimes
 offered. Products from Fujitsu, HP, Huawei, IBM, SAP, Vnomic, and Zenoss were featured.” but this edit is not in the version you just sent. Did you decide to un-do
 the edit or did it just fall through cracks? 

I decided to not mess with the sentence structure as it was not incorrect; simply it did not read as I would have authored it.  In addition, I did not want to mess with the body
 of the PR as to cause SAP issues and minimize the need to re-review.

Please let me know your opinion.

Thanks, 

Matt 

From:        "Probst, Richard" <>

To:        Matt Rutkowski/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, ""
 <>

Date:        10/07/2013 11:27 AM

Subject:        RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx uploaded

Matt, two quick comments:

-          We should use a standard way to attribute quotes. The SAP quote is attributed in the paragraph itself, while the other quotes are attributed with names appearing after
 the quote. Either way is fine, we should just pick one way. 

-          On the call, you edited the text that reads “…as a TOSCA service template between cloud orchestration tools and runtimes
 offered. Products from Fujitsu, HP, Huawei, IBM, SAP, Vnomic, and Zenoss were featured.” but this edit is not in the version you just sent. Did you decide to un-do the edit
 or did it just fall through cracks? 

 

Best,

  --Richard

 

 

From:
 [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Matthew Rutkowski

Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 8:40 AM

To: 

Subject: [tosca-interop] Groups - tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx uploaded

  

Submitter's message

Edits including those from our October 7th meeting. 

-- Mr. Matthew Rutkowski 

Document Name:
tosca-interop-ics-pressrelease 2013-10-07 edits.docx

 

No description provided.

Download Latest Revision

Public Download Link

 

Submitter: Mr. Matthew Rutkowski

Group: TOSCA Interoperability SC

Folder: Documents

Date submitted: 2013-10-07 08:39:29
Next in thread → Next in month →