答复: RE: [tosca] One question about Namespace Alias and URI.

Hi,

It confused me and I wonder why "alias" was removed. If I understand correctly, the alias is necessary.

If we remove the alias from the spec, what shall we use to define the tosca_definition_version below?  Would that be the whole URI? That's too long.

tosca_definitions _version:      tosca_simple_profile_for_nfv_1_0

 

description: service template of a VDU   # Human readable description of the Vdu.

                   

topology_template:

    

inputs:

Thanks,

Feng yuanxing

原始邮件

发件人： <>;

收件人：冯远兴10034308; <>;

抄送人： <>;

日 期 ：2017年11月21日 13:24

主 题 ：RE: [tosca] One question about Namespace Alias and URI.

Hi Shitao,

 

Based on our latest namespace discussions, I believe the “alias” is no longer needed. You would only ever use the fully qualified URI (from the Target Namespace) or the prefix.

 

Chris

 

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 11:32 PM
 To: 
 Cc: 
 Subject: [tosca] One question about Namespace Alias and URI.

 

 

Hi all,

 

I noticed that namespace URI and alias in TOSCA NFV Profile Specification is defined.   And we use the alias in the sample template as below.  On yesterday's nfv call, we decided to remove the  alias. Is that alias the same one referred in the following table?

 

Alias 

Target Namespace

Specification Description

tosca_simple_profile_for_nfv_1_0

http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/ns/simple/yaml/1.0/nfv/1.0/

The TOSCA Simple Profile for NFV v1.0 target namespace and namespace alias.

 

tosca_definitions _version:      tosca_simple_profile_for_nfv_1_0

 

description: service template of a VDU   # Human readable description of the Vdu.

                   

topology_template:

    

inputs: