RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec

From
Magnus Martikainen <>
Date
2004-09-21T17:07:34+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [trans-ws] Collaborative editing of the spec
Hi Stephen,

 

This is a great initiative! I am all for
it, it should help us a lot to keep the specs up-to-date if everyone that
identifies an issue can go in and change it directly. 

But obviously with that freedom comes some
responsibility, and I guess we may need to put together some guidelines for how
we should work.

 

I am not familiar with Wiki or RSS so I
have a couple of questions: 

* Is it possible to track the history of the
content, retrieve an “old” version, or see exactly what changes has
been done and perhaps reverting to an earlier version?

* Is it possible to get notifications when
content is changed and to see what changes were made?

* It could be useful to be able to do edit
the content as a “change proposal” without it explicitly being part
of the “official” content until it has been signed off by others. Would
this be possible?

* Is it possible to annotate changes with
comments explaining why they were made?

 

Thanks a lot for taking your time in setting
this up!

Magnus

 

 

From:
 [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004
3:51 AM

To: 

Subject: [trans-ws] Collaborative
editing of the spec

 

All, 

given
that a number of people are tasked with editing the spec, I thought that a
collaborative environment such as a wiki might be useful.  To that end, I
spent a few hours creating a wiki, and making it publically available.

Check
out: http://212.147.140.51:2500 

For
those of you who use RSS feed aggregators, there is also as RSS feed available,
so you can follow progress on the doc:
http://212.147.140.51:2500/wiki/rss_with_content 

The
wiki engine (Instiki - www.instiki.org) is supposed to have PDF & LaTeX
export functionalaity, but that appears to be broken at the moment.  However,
when I get that sorted, it should mean that we can produce a printable copy of
the spec directly from the wiki. 

Take
a look, and let me know what you think, and whether you reckon it's worth
pursuing with this approach, or whether the posted/emailed Word docs are
better. 

Peter,
if you're happy with this approach, feel free to post a link on the TransWS
home page.  I'll keep the wiki server up for the duration of the
development of the spec (and perhaps move it to a more permanent home if this
exercise is successful). 

Regards,

Steve

---------------------------------------------

Stephen Flinter

Connect Global Solutions

[t] +353 (0)1 882 9038

[f] +353 (0)1 882 9050

[m] +353 87 798 1228

[e] 

[w] www.connectcgs.com

--------------------------------------------

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify

the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by

MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com

**********************************************************************