Re: [ubl-cmsc] ebXML as basis for UBL context work?

On the principle being applied at the TC level ("it's better to start with 
something than nothing" -- in the TC's case, xCBL 3.0), I think we should 
start with the Vienna document.  Even if it were deeply broken, and I don't 
think it is, it's likelier we'll succeed if we start with *some* proposal.

         Eve

At 04:11 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote:
>Okay, we're ready to move forward on discussing rhe individual issues!
>Here's the first one. I'll send off the others in separate threads so that
>the discussion stays structured.
>
>1) Do we consider the "Document Assembly and Context Rules" document from
>Vienna (v1.04) to be the starting point for our work, which we will be
>refining? Or so we want to start from a clean slate and pull in input from
>the document as needed? The question here is whether people consider the
>Vienna work to be deeply broken in some way or whether it simply needs to be
>finalized.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com