Eduardo,
We had a short discussion about redefine in NDR about a month or more ago.
We didn't know enough about it to make an informed decision, and so let it
go. I think it is very appropriate that you bring it forward now, with use
case and purpose.
Lisa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eduardo Gutentag" <>
To: "Context Methodology" <>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 12:06 PM
Subject: [ubl-cmsc] Summary
> I will not dignify what follows with the name "minutes" ;)
>
> We met this morning at 8am Pacific.
>
> Present were Eduardo Gutentag, Dan Vint, Michael Grimley, Matthew Gertner.
>
> We discussed Dan's suggestion of using xsd:redefine as the enveloping
methodology
> for implementing the CM; Dan explained the concept and its use a bit more,
> and all present agreed there is a lot of merit in it.
>
> Eduardo's memory appears to be faulty (like we didn't know that
before...),
> as there seems to be no record of NDR ever agreeing not to use redefine,
or
> even talking about it.
>
> Dan will send a complete example (hopefully short) of the use of what he
> has been calling adapter schemas, following in the steps of the vocabulary
> used in xml-dev.
>
> Eduardo is expanding the Introduction to include things we take for
granted
> but should not be all left to references to other papers. He will send a
> new version soon, like today if possible.
>
> Eduardo is still waiting for Arofan to fulfill his AI from last week,
namely
> send references to other papers or specs.
>
> Eduardo will present the concept of redefine and adapter schemas to the
NDR
> group during their meeting on Wednesday 23 (but only if Dan is there
too...)
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail:
> Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442
> Sun Microsystems Inc. | 1800 Harrison St. Oakland, CA
94612
> W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair
>
