Re: [ubl-comment] Further thoughts on Party data for 2.3

From
G. Ken Holman <>
Date
2017-11-11T01:30:20+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl-comment] Further thoughts on Party data for 2.3
"I would welcome submissions of a UBL subset and a specification
   of processes that would be suitable [for MSMEs]"