At 2003-03-02 08:53 -0800, Probert, Sue wrote:
>Either sounds good.
>
>How about Forms Interface SC as another possibility?
I'm not fond of that myself because of the connotations on "Interface" ...
in my proposed scope I'm focusing on the fact that all we are doing is
specifying presentation and layout.
The actual interfaces that meet those presentations and layouts will be up
to the respective technologies that use our work products as guidelines. I
would be worried that using "Interface" in the title would connote too much
about the physical implementations of the layouts.
If you can accept my argument, then that leaves us with the two:
FPSC - Forms Presentation Subcommittee
FLSC - Forms Layout Subcommittee
Euphoniously (which started this thread) I think the first one rolls off
the tongue more easily, but am really ambivalent between the two and will
accept anyone else's preference for the latter.
Dan, you used the term "Forms" in one of your posts as just a standalone
name, can you accept either of the ones above? Again I'm trying to
underscore that as a committeee we are focusing on presentation and layout,
not implementation.
If I hear no further opinions or suggestions before 2003-03-05 00:00UTC
then I'll submit FPSC to Jon for consideration.
Thanks!
.............. Ken
--
Upcoming hands-on in-depth XSLT/XPath and/or XSL-FO
North America: June 16-20, 2003
G. Ken Holman mailto:
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 0-13-140374-5 Definitive XSL-FO
ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-10-1 Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO
Male Breast Cancer Awareness http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
