Hi Tim
Then I have nothing against you suggestion else that I would like very much
the close the issue-list.
/Peter
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Martin Forsberg [mailto:]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 11:06
Til:
Emne: RE: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
Hi Peter,
I've looked into the CC-library and the cross industry invoice and I can
not find any reference to a visiting-address. Perhaps it has been
changed since our London-meeting. The only addresses used in the CII are
* Structured Postal Address
* Unstructured Postal Address
* Post Box Postal Address
Regards
Martin Forsberg
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:]
Sent: den 25 augusti 2006 10:34
To:
Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last
day in London.
/Peter
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc:
Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it
align?
Peter Borresen wrote:
>It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment with
>UN/CEFACT
>
>/Peter
>
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:]
>Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33
>Til:
>Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
>
>
>In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a
>Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address". Is
>this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go
>to to see the party? If so, then can i propose we change it to Party.
>Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address).
>
>The reason I ask is because:
>a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english and b. the
>UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location.
>
>We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the
>call next monday?
>
>
>
--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228
postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
