← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Lastest changed agreed with Peter

From
KBUFRS by Qoberto Disternino
Date
2010-01-22T15:41:04+00:00
ID
Thread
Lastest changed agreed with Peter
Hello Arianna,

as agreed with Peter I provide you the structure of the Service
Provider Party ASBIE:

Naming is changed slightly to expand the usage possibilties.

ServiceProviderParty (0..n)

    - ID                                         (0..1)

    - ServiceTypeCode                 (0..1)

    - ServiceType                          (0..1)           textual

    - Party                                     (0..1)

    - ServiceContact                      (0..1)

Definition:  An association to the Service Provider Party (e.g. the
outsourcing party)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REMAINING ISSUES FOLLOWS ( WE FORGOT THESE ! ):

We still miss this part to be applied by eDoCreator:

  
    

      6

      
      FIRTG.17

      
      To be updated by eDoCreator.

      
      Current disposition:

The session information is not related to the document but to the
process.  We resolved to add a CollaborationID in order to correlate
the document with its process.  Session data cannot be added on the way
as the document could be signed. Add CollaboratioID in all documet
below ProfileID.  See remark for definition
    

  

and this one to be discussed with Tim:

  
    

      11

      
      FIRTG.06

      
      Waiting for further discussion

      
      The end-2-end identifier, as intended by
ISO20022, is the same concept of the cbc:InvoicingPartyReference we
currently have in the UBL RemittanceAdvice document.

The definition is strictly that one provided by UBL 2.0, "The Invoicing
Party's reference to the payment, previously requested of the Payer to
accompany remittance."

Into UBL this is a textual reference and not an identifier, but the
bigger problem is to clarify the relationship between this
reconciliation reference information and the Invoice line items.

I think there is not a precise rule for this, as it is up to the
Invoicing Party to indicate one or more references for reconciliation
purposes.

Such reference could be associated to a single invoice line item, a set
of line items, a complete invoice, more than one invoice and even
different parts of different invoices.

The solution seems to be to provide this InvoicingPartyReference at
line Item and in the root of the document (RemittanceAdvice and
Invoices)

      
      To be evaluated by Tim McGrath as this is a
cross-domain information transported end-2-end for reconciliation
purposes.  Also it impacts on many UBL documents (Invoice,
RemittanceAdvice, ...)
    

  

end the last:

  
    

      19

      
      FIRTG-C.05

      
      Waiting fro further discussion

      
      If the account owner is a private person and not
an organization, the bank requires a Person identification (Fiscal
code, SSN, Passport ID, ...) of the account Owner.

      

Example: In Italy the Owner's fiscal code is required (Codice Fiscale)

      

NOTE: This is similar to the PersonID I asked to add to cac:Person (see
"PersonIdentification" scheme available as codelist on ISO20022)

      
      Add a cbc:OwnerID (0..1) to the
cac:FinancialAccount

      
    

  

-- 

JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino

  
    

       mobile: +39 328 2148123
      
    

    

       skype: roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc
      
    

    

      [UBL Technical Committee]
      http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl
      
    

    

      [UBL Online Community]
      http://ubl.xml.org
      
    

    

      [UBL International Conferences]
      http://www.ublconference.org
      
    

    

      [UBL Italian Localization Subcommittee]
      http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl-itlsc
      
    

    

      [Iniziativa divulgativa UBL Italia]
      http://www.ubl-italia.org
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread