Hi
Stephen
If the
spreadsheet structure is to be reviewed to cover ACCs as well, then I suggest
that the latest TBG17 submission template structure should be taken into
consideration. Marion can provide this as the UNBL liaison
to TBG17. The closer that these two spreadsheet
templates become, the easier the submission to the UN/CEFACT ACC Library
harmonisation process becomes. Also, as EDIFIX understands the TBG17 format
this should make for less unnecessary mapping
exercises.
regards
Sue
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green
[mailto:]
Sent: 20 May 2005
12:43
To:
Subject: [ubl-ssc]
Proposal from China/F2F for enhanced structure
Greetings
I have it down that we should be meeting
next
Thursday so I thought I'd propose that
we
take a little time to consider the
proposals
from China (following plenary
discussions)
for how to enhance the spreadsheets'
modular structure to cater for
expansion
and CC requirements.
I'm not sure how the timescale is
envisiaged
for this. I'm also concerned to get
feedback
on how things will be if we don't have a
set
of instructions from NDR team until near
the
end of June (as the schedules have
been
indicating recently).
I wrote to the TC a response (sorry it was
hurried
and poorly set out due to time
constraints) to the
spreadsheets proposal which might help
discussion.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200505/msg00068.html
I've also prototyped another set of
schemas
to see whether version 2.0 could easily
use
the ATG2 datatype schemas and how
future
minor releases might use polymorphism.
This
isn't yet agreed in NDR but might have
been
discussed in the Wed Atlantic call in time
for
our meeting on Thursday.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200505/msg00067.html
Would folk be able to attend Thursday?
It might be agood idea to aim to
attend
the Wed TC call too as I hope there
will
be further discussion of the 2.0
schema
requirements.
All the best
Steve
