RE: Merge og definition review version 4

Dear Peter,

Thank you for calling my attention to the particular rows in which you found a ? in Jons column.

 

I am uncertain what file Tim provided you and if it contained TSC entries. 

 

However,  I have reviewed those rows in the last TSC submission  (ProposedFinalCommonlit-edit for Transport20121214) and found that the definition for your row 920 was not in column J. (it was in col I).  I have corrected that in the attached that represents the full TSC definition submission (TSC’s row 393). As for the other rows, I have confirmed that there is a proposed definition in Col J for each of the other rows you identified. 

 

 

 

Regards,

Andy

 

 

 

From: Peter L. Borresen [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:10 PM
To: 'G. Ken Holman'
Cc: ; 'Andrew M Schoka'
Subject: Merge og definition review version 4

 

Dear Ken

 

I have merged the spreadsheet with the input I got from Tim today. I have included to comments on the 10 rows that Kees pointed out. There are still missing definition about TSC issues in the following rows:

888

908

920

1678

1717

1798

1799

2089

2213

 

Best regards and good luck 

 

Peter

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6032 - Release Date: 01/14/13

Attachment:
ProposedFinalCommonlib-edit_for_Transport20130119.xls

Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet