Tim,
In the context of tools we should concentrate on (1) and (2), particularly
(2) as I suspect this will be the most common use case. (3) is long job as
it demands some form of development and approval process. (4) and (5) demand
just a development process and should be easier than (3).
Do we not have an extension use case which is like (2) but adding something,
with or without wishing it to be a part of the core standard? I suspect this
will be a common use case as UBL schemas evolve.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim McGrath" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: [ubl-ttsc] suggestions for scenarios
