Title: Message
Tony,
There
is no particular reason that's specific to this case, just the general rule of
not allowing unnecessary variability in message content to make the payloads
easier to process and to eliminate dumb errors.
I am
not suggesting that this be one way or another - just trying to figure out the
reasoning. Your response was helpful.
Thank
you,
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Rogers, Tony
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:34
PM
To: Daniel Feygin; ;
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Groups -
uddi-spec-tc-cr042-caseFoldFindQualifiers-20030717.doc
uploaded
While this is an interesting suggestion, I don't see it that way.
There is no risk of confusing one find qualifier with another, even if we
accept any case. Therefore I see no reason to insist that the qualifiers be
provided in any particular case. If a request arrives with a find qualifier of
"ORLIKEKEYS" or even "OrLiKeKeYs", then I'm happy to accept that as indicating
the intent of the request, even if it doesn't match the case in the
spec.
Is there a good reason for these to require matching case?
Tony.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Feygin
[mailto:]
Sent: Thu 17/07/2003 21:09
To: ;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Groups -
uddi-spec-tc-cr042-caseFoldFindQualifiers-20030717.doc
uploaded
Claus,
I understand that it is not explicitly
specified anywhere in the spec, but
my personal interpretation of any
literal string is that it is
case-sensitive, unless explicitly specified
otherwise. My feeling is that
others operate similarly, although,
certainly, alternative interpretation is
possible.
Specification
text always maintains proper case when listing find
qualifiers' short
names. I wonder whether this implies that the authors
intended for
the find qualifiers to be case-sensitive.
You skipped the
"Alternatives Considered (optional)" section, so we have no
way of
knowing why you settled on the case-insensitive approach. Is
it
because the alternative is more restrictive than a spec reader's
potential
assumption?
Daniel
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:37 PM
> To:
> Subject: [uddi-spec] Groups -
>
uddi-spec-tc-cr042-caseFoldFindQualifiers-20030717.doc
uploaded
>
>
> The document
>
uddi-spec-tc-cr042-caseFoldFindQualifiers-20030717.doc has
> been
submitted by Claus von Riegen ()
> to the UDDI
Specification TC document repository.
>
> Document
Description:
> Please review this new CR. I'd like to put it on next
week's agenda.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
Claus
>
> Download Document:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/downloa
d.php/2920/uddi-spec-tc-cr042-caseFoldFindQualifiers-20030717.doc
View
Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/document.php?document_id=2920
PLEASE
NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
application
may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be
able to copy and paste
the entire link address into the address field of
your web browser.
-OASIS Open Administration
You may leave
a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/members/leave_workgro
up.php
You
may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/members/leave_workgroup.php
