RE: [uddi-spec] Yet more comments on v3.0.1

Title: Message

Pleased to see someone is reading the comments I make :-)

 

With regard to 10.5 - I cannot see what I was thinking when I read 
that sentence earlier. It makes sense on rereading it. Perhaps that's an 
indication that it can be misread? No matter - let it stand.

 

With region to the opening of section 11, I feel that it is important that 
we qualify the statement "...a set of tModels has been established for UDDI". 
Without qualification it reads as though this set is complete, and requires no 
addition, a sentiment that is the reverse of the truth.

 

Tony Rogers

  
-----Original Message----- 
From: John Colgrave 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Tue 26/08/2003 1:04 
  
To:  
Cc: 
  
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Yet more comments on 
  v3.0.1

  

  
I do not agree with 
  either of these changes.

  
 

  

  
John 
Colgrave

  
IBM

  
 

  

  
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: Rogers, 
  Tony [mailto:] 
Sent: 25 August 2003 08:03
To: 
  
Subject: [uddi-spec] Yet more comments on 
  v3.0.1

  
 

  

  
Section 10.5 Value sets with 
  entiity keys as values

  

  
The third sentence should read: 
  "They must be mapped as entity keys everywhere they are used." - removing 
  "are" and "else".

  

  
 

  

  
Section 11, opening sentence reads 
  a little oddly. Perhaps "a set of tModels" could be "a basic set of tModels"? 
  Or even "a canonical set of tModels"?

  

  
 

  
Tony Rogers