RE: [uddi-spec] Submission of draft TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

Title: Submission of draft TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

Claus,

 

I took a to-do to clarify what was meant by the 
comments relating to Issues 17 and 22. We've concluded that there is in fact no 
problem with the sample query and what it is expected to return, so please 
disregards issues 17 and 22.

 

Luc

From: Luc Clement 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 
11:08
To: 'Von Riegen, Claus'
Cc: 'uddi-spec'; 
''; John Colgrave 
()
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Submission of draft TN 
"Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

Claus,

 

Please find attached input of Systinet's review of 
the TN. One thing to note is that (and also pointed out by John Colgrave) we 
should consider updating the Using WSDL in a UDDI Registry, Version 2 
TN to generalize the wsdl:portType tModel. Doing so now is warranted given that Errata #1 is 
currently under consideration; we might as well make the update now and avoid 
another errata.

 

Please also note that I would be happy to 
be one of the two editors of this TN; I think that John may also have 
volunteered (or been volunteered).

 

Regards,

Luc

From: Von Riegen, Claus 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 
10:17
To: uddi-spec
Subject: [uddi-spec] Submission of draft 
TN "Using BPEL4WS in a UDDI registry"

As promised during the FTF last month, I just 
uploaded a draft Technical Note that outlines an approach for publishing BPEL4WS 
abstract processes in UDDI so that these process definitions, related tModels 
that represent Web service interfaces and bindingTemplates that represent 
implementing Web services can be found in a standardized manner.

The document can be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/download.php/6407/uddi-spec-tc-tn-bpel-20040415.doc.

May I ask to add an agenda item to our next 
conference call in order to discuss next steps in this regard? 

Thanks, 
 Claus