Re: [uddi-spec] Second objection - OASIS UDDI v3 Specification

From
Bndrew Iately
Date
2005-02-01T03:37:22+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [uddi-spec] Second objection - OASIS UDDI v3 Specification
Was a definition of federate provided
with the feedback?

If none was provided, we can probably
assume that the comment was related to affiliation for tommorow's call.

Regards,

Andrew Hately

IBM Software Group, Emerging Technologies 

email: 

phone: (512) 838-2866

"Luc Clement"
<> 

01/31/2005 09:07 PM

To

<>

cc

Subject

[uddi-spec] Second objection
- OASIS UDDI v3 Specification

Please note the second objection

 

 

Luc Cl幦ent

Senior Program Manager, Systinet

Tel: +1.781.362.1330 / Cell: +1.978.793.2162 / www.systinet.com

 

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/vote_details.php?id=675&voter_id=777

 

 Ballot:  Approve UDDI v3.0.2 as an OASIS
standard Company: 

Mitre Corporation

Vote: 

No

Comment: 

MITRE would like the TC to reconsider the current wording
in the standard regarding Subscription APIs, a functionality that is being
seriously considered by a MITRE customer. Specifically, the TC could consider
the foll. wording change "If a UDDI registry must federate with other
UDDI registries, then the registries SHOULD have at least one node that
offers the Subscription API, otherwise the Subscription API is OPTIONAL".