Re: [PATCH] used ring: define the meaning and requirements of the len field.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:35:12AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> writes:
> > So, if you think we should include this in 1.0 cs03, then you
> > need to vote no on the cs03 ballot, and we'll
> > redo a draft with these changes applied.
> 
> On balance, I think that is necessary.  I hate to think of an
> implementation getting this wrong.
> 
> I encourage others to change their votes to No too.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rusty.

OK, I closed the ballot, no point it dragging it out more.