On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:58:07 +0100
Cornelia Huck <> wrote:
> Tags: inv, virtio
> From: Cornelia Huck <>
> To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <>
> Cc: , , Halil Pasic <>
> Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 1/3] shared memory: Define shared memory regions
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:58:07 +0100
> Sender: <>
> Organization: Red Hat GmbH
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:37:56 +0000
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <> wrote:
>
> > * Cornelia Huck () wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:06:25 +0000
> > > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <> wrote:
> > >
> > > > So these are all moving this 1/3 forward - has anyone got comments on
> > > > the transport specific implementations?
> > >
> > > No comment on pci or mmio, but I've hacked something together for ccw.
> > > Basically, one sense-type ccw for discovery and a control-type ccw for
> > > activation of the regions (no idea if we really need the latter), both
> > > available with ccw revision 3.
> > >
> > > No idea whether this will work this way, though...
> >
> > That sounds (from a shm perspective) reasonable; can I ask why the
> > 'activate' is needed?
>
> The activate interface is actually what I'm most unsure about; maybe
> Halil can chime in.
Sorry, I unfortunately kept deferring looking into this. Will have to do
some more thinking. I promise to give you my feedback by Monday end of
day if not sooner. Does that work with you?
Regards,
Halil
