On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 07:01:40PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Refer to "Shared memory capability" and not to "Device-specific
> configuration".
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <>
> ---
> content.tex | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 1bfce9f..60b6072 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ \subsubsection{Shared memory capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
> The identifier in \field{cap.id} does not denote a certain order of
> preference; it is only used to uniquely identify a region.
>
> -\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Device-specific configuration}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
> +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Shared memory capability}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
>
> The region defined by the combination of \field{cap.offset},
> \field{offset_hi}, and \field {cap.length}, \field{length_hi}
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ \subsubsection{Shared memory capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
>
> The \field{cap.id} MUST be unique for any one device instance.
>
> -\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Device-specific configuration}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
> +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Shared memory capability}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
>
> The region defined by the combination of the \field {cap.offset},
> \field {cap.offset_hi}, and \field {cap.length}, \field
And I guess we then need to fix the conformance clauses?
> --
> 2.21.0
