On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:11:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote:
>
> > Link conformance statements into conformance chapter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <>
> > ---
> > conformance.tex | 9 +++++++++
> > packed-ring.tex | 16 +++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex
> > index 9807c30..663e7c3 100644
> > --- a/conformance.tex
> > +++ b/conformance.tex
> > @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating idx}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Notifying The Device}
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues}
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}
>
> I wonder whether we could use the opportunity to fix that "PAcked" typo
> here as well.
It's just a ref but if you like it, sure, make it a patch on top.
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support}
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table / Indirect Descriptors}
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating flags}
> > +\item \ref{drivernormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Sending Available Buffer Notifications}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Initialization}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Cleanup}
> > \item \ref{drivernormative:Reserved Feature Bits}
> > @@ -340,6 +346,9 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
> > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Used Buffer Notification Suppression}
> > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Used Ring}
> > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Available Buffer Notification Suppression}
> > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues}
> > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}
> > +\item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Packed Virtqueues / Scatter-Gather Support}
> > \item \ref{devicenormative:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Shared Memory Regions}
> > \item \ref{devicenormative:Reserved Feature Bits}
> > \end{itemize}
>
> I guess it is ok to link this up as an editorial update; the statements
> are pre-existing, and an implementation that does not know the feature
> bit remains compliant.
I agree.
--
MST
