Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] rework notifications terminology

From
Michael S. Tsirkin <>
Date
2018-07-03T00:02:01+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] rework notifications terminology
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 02:21:26PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> Abstract 
> --------
> The terminology around notifications is currently somewhat
> fragmented. Unify notifications terminology using available and used
> buffer notification consistently for the virtqueue notifications.
> Consistent use of the term configuration change notification is of
> concern.

OK I see there are acks already - do you want to start voting on this?



> Changelog:
> ---------
> v2 -> v3:
> * Addressed all comments from the previous round
> * Added r-b's
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> * Addressed Stefan's comments (mostly typos, grammar and inconsistencies).
>   Thanks Stefan!
> * Rebased onto the current master.
> 
> RFC -> v1:
> * Devices and the transports PCI and MMIO were omitted.
> Now the rework should be complete.
> * Addressed review comments and minor changes for the first
> three patches. 
> 
> Halil Pasic (6):
>   notifications: unify notifications wording in core
>   notifications: notifications as basic virtio facility
>   ccw: map common notifications terminology to ccw
>   pci: map common notifications terminology to PCI
>   mmio: map common notifications terminology to MMIO
>   notifications: update notifications terminology for devices
> 
>  cl-os.tex       |    2 +-
>  conformance.tex |   10 ++--
>  content.tex     |  164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  packed-ring.tex |   60 +++++++++++---------
>  split-ring.tex  |   72 ++++++++++++++----------
>  5 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: