On Fri, Oct 15 2021, Pankaj Gupta <> wrote:
>> So, I ran into some problems while trying to apply this.
>>
>> First, this is against an older version of the tree, so it did not apply
>> cleanly.
>
> Sorry! somehow i missed this.
No worries, I fixed that up; but rebasing makes things easier for the
person applying it.
>>
>> Second, the conformance section looks off: we don't have a driver
>> conformance section, and the device conformance section ends up being
>> called a driver conformance section. Unfortunately, I had neglected to
>> review that properly :(
>>
>> I think the following would be correct; I'm inclined to apply this spec
>> with it as an editorial edit. Any comments/objections?
>
> my bad :(
>
> Thank you for your help!
> Hope this makes into master now.
I pushed this out now. If something is off, we can fix that on top.
