Feedback: PCI device spec

Il 29/01/2014 03:45, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> I appreciate it's convenient for us not to specify such details. Maybe
> it's the right thing to do. But I also understand my colleague's
> frustration with this aspect of the spec. Thus the discussion.
This.  The spec *exists* so we get more, good implementations.  What helps this?  Including a non-normative paragraph discussing use of PCI class?  Or ignoring it and leaving implementers confused and frustrated so we look more rigorous?
A non-normative paragraph makes sense.  Paolo