[virtio] Groups - Ballot opened: "Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification"

Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification  has opened.
Ballot Title :  Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification
Question
Should the TC accept changes listed in the description as non material, and Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft with these changes as a Committee Specification?
Closing Date : Wednesday, 20 August 2014 @ 11:59 pm EDT
Description
Please vote Yes if you agree with the following.
 If you disagree, please vote No.

 I move that:
 The TC accepts the following changes to the specification,
 to resolve issues VIRTIO-110 through VIRTIO-113:

 https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-111

 r412: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201407/msg00017.html
 Fix minor typos as reported in ARM's feedback.

 https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-112

 r413: ">http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]

 legacy: consistently use past tense
 Paragraph with general description of feature negotiation
 for legacy devices mixed present and past tense.
 As rest of legacy sections all use past tense,
 fix the only instance of the present tense:
 s/do/did/ for consistency.

 https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-113

 r414: ">http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected]
Grammar fixup: Legacy devices are  they  not  it .

 https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-110
 r415: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00013.html
 * Typos and language mistakes in 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2 and 4.2.2.2.
 * Extra clarifications for InterruptACK.

 r416: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00014.html
 Make it clear that the legacy section is non-normative,
 removing all MUSTs.

 (not in svn) https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00033.html
 * Extra clarifications for QueueReady and ConfigGeneration
 * Added alignment requirement section, to formalise
 hidden assumptions about register accesses

 (not in svn) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtio.devel/522
 Acknowlegde valuable input from Brian Foley.

 The above changes are highlighted in the following version of the document:

 https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/download.php/53834/virtio-v1.0-os-diff.pdf

 You can also use the  revision history  chapter to locate the changes more easily.

 The TC resolves that the above changes are all Non-Material.

 The TC resolves to request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft, with the above changes, as a Committee Specification.

 Location of the specification with the above changes:

 https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/download.php/53833/virtio-v1.0-os.zip

 This archive includes the editable Tex sources,
 specification in PDF and HTML formats, as well as
 versions with changes since CSD03 highlighted.
Vote
Yes  No  Abstain
Group : OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO)

TC
Date Opened : Wednesday, 13 August 2014 @ 12:00 pm EDT