On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:23 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote: > >
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:21:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:44:41 +0200 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote: > > > > > >
> We will also need some process to periodically approve > > >
> post-factum formatting, typo fixes and similar simple changes. > > >
> We don't want issue tracking for these I think. > > >
> I'll probably put these up for voting about once > > >
> a month or so, we'll see. > > > > >
> Should we perhaps have an issue that is collecting all those minor > >
> fixes and is simply opened after month? > > > > > >
> All this likely will mean there will be a bunch of ballots > > >
> running on the TC at all times. > > >
> If you can't vote, pls remember to mark up your status > > >
> as leave of absence. > > > > >
> After having searched on the oasis site for a while: Remind me how one > >
> does so? > > > > > >
> Cornelia, could you please start with CCW patches you posted so we can > > >
> try this out, see how well it works? > > > > >
> That would be 116-119 and 129, right? I can give it a try later. > > >
> I can do the technicalies if it's hard for you, but >
> I need to know which are bugfixes intended for 1.0-cs03 and >
> which are features for 1.1 only. >
> OK, changed 116/118/119/127. Don't remember the reporter though (ISTR
> it was me). I think so. Pls fill it. Do you think 116 is non material?
> 117 is not ready yet (no proposed change). I think we also
> need to handle 125, don't we? why not, that's easy.
> Please let me know how I messed up :)
