On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:09:04 +0100
Cornelia Huck <> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:01:08 -0500
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:24:32PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
> >
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:03:37PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > + If this feature bit is negotiated, the ordering in effect for any
> > > > + memory accesses by the driver that need to be ordered in a specific way
> > > > + with respect to accesses by the device is the one suitable for devices
> > > > + described by the platform.
> > >
> >
> I had to read this sentence several times. How about: "Some memory
> >
> accesses by the driver need to be ordered in a specific way with
> >
> respect to accesses by the device. If this feature bit is negotiated,
> >
> these accesses need to match the ordering requirements of devices as
> >
> described for the platform."
> > >
> >
> In any case:
> > >
> >
> Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <>
> >
>
> I think we can make this change under the trivial changes rule, thanks!
>
> I agree, and I think that Jens' wording is easier to read.
>
I find both of these quite tricky. Yet I consider both versions are good
enough.
