On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 03:06:02PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: >
>
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <> >
> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 10:58 AM > > >
> Why not just do this in the VIRTIO TC? > > >
> The workflow and infrastructure for developing the VIRTIO spec already exists. >
> A weekly or bi-weekly virtio-net call can be scheduled. > > > >
> Are you hitting scalability bottlenecks or limitations with the current VIRTIO TC? >
> May be.
> SC is mainly networking specific interested members who has the described mission and SOP.
> This requires interworking on many features, discussion, and design in phased approach like suggested above. >
> Also it is too much of the ask for the whole TC to get involved in such process.
> Better to start with forum that is focused on mission and SOP, committed to deliver on agreed timeline in 4 step approach. >
> Few months later when operation works fine, may be main TC can also adopt similar approach to wider level. What is the scope of the sub-committee? Is it a project with a specific goal like designing a new VIRTIO network device from scratch that is friendlier to PCI device implementation? Or is it supposed to be home for all virtio-net development? Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
