RE: [ws-caf] [WSRF][Fwd: [OASIS members] Press Release to Announce OASIS

Hu Joe:

> Thanks Jim - care to elaborate as to why it is a poor fit?

Sure thing. WS-RF talks in terms of "resources" (which are addressable
components of a service's back-end) whereas WSA is defined in terms of
services and messages. This is a view echoed by the WS-* specs
(including WS-CAF) which define protocol actors (services) and
interactions (messages), and specifically do not try to peek behind a
service to see its "resources".

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name