Eric, are you able to report anything about the workshop, or was it
held under nondisclosure? Any response to your proposal? Thanks.
--Pete
Pete Wenzel <>
Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
Thus spoke James Bryce Clark () on Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:36:30PM -0800:
> >> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> >>
> >> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:24:08 -0800 (PST)
> >> From: Eric Newcomer
> >> Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Statement for WS-Transactions
> >> workshop
> >> To:
> >>
> >> Apologies - I typed this in much earlier today, but
> >> our email system has been out since noon, and is
> >> apparently still down. So I'm posting from my
> >> private account. Eric
> >> ------
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Per today's concall, here is the edited version of the
> >> statement I plan to give on behalf of the WS-CAF TC at
> >> the Microsoft/IBM/BEA WS-Transactions feedback
> >> workshop Wednesday March 10. Please let me know if
> >> there are any further comments or suggestions.
> >>
> >> The WS-CAF TC would like to recognize the common
> >> ancestry and technical similarities across the WS-T,
> >> WS-C, WS-BA and WS-CAF sets of specifications. During
> >> our work we've discovered the benefits of separating
> >> out context management as a generic mechanism, and
> >> have developed a key additional protocol called the
> >> Business Process transaction model. We think the
> >> WS-T, WS-C, and WS-BA specifications would benefit
> >> from including these major concepts.
> >>
> >> We propose a discussion on finding the best way to
> >> move forward and bring our work together.
> >>
> >> Thanks -
> >>
> >> Eric
