1) I acknowledge neither one was named in the roll call vote. 2) TimeStamp is a throw-away. We made it, we're done with it, in conversations it is assumed. The TC has not spent any bandwidth on it since the initial production. We were asked to do it by parts of the national smart grid process. It is not part of the service interactions we are defining elsewhere. You can delete it or publish it as you please. As I have stated repeatedly, it is a side issue. If you doubt that, you can ask the TC. 3) You as TC Admin may declare whatever you want. If you want to say that you want another roll call vote two weeks after first because you finally notice, that is your right. It will be my right to complain. 4) The components that are included in ws-calendar.xsd are all in iCalendar-wscal-extensions.xsd. If you think I am not representing the sense of the TC accurately, well, we can ask them. If you think it is useful to have non-consensus non-standard alternate schemas on the OASIS site in perpetuity, go for it. The relevant issue is, as *you* highlight, ** the constituent parts cannot advance independently of each other or stand on their own**. The ambiguity is that TimeStamp was not explicitly included in the zipped file that I sent. To be consistent and punctilious, you should include both or exclude both. Including both is clearly more harmful. Excluding both is a better fit with the process as outline below, but if that is the intent, I am not sure why you keep coming back to try to include them. Whether you want to stretch this out for another week is up to you. I invite anyone on the TC who is feeling misused by my "misrepresentations" to chime in. tc "If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" - Peter Drucker Toby Considine TC9, Inc TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Email:
Phone: (919)619-2104 http://www.tcnine.com/ blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
