← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

New Issue: Purpose behind dup requirements?

From
Scott de Deugd <>
Date
2008-10-08T23:46:21+00:00
ID
Thread
New Issue: Purpose behind dup requirements?
Please defer discussions on this issue until a time this issue is accepted
and is assigned a number. 

  

Description: 

  

Document: DPWS Version 1.0 

Line number:  Line 245

Owner: Scott de Deugd 

  

Description: 

Editorial:

Section 3.6 says:

R0036: A SERVICE MAY reject a MIME SOAP
ENVELOPE if the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field mechanism of any
MIME part is not "binary".

R0037: A SERVICE MUST NOT send a MIME SOAP
ENVELOPE unless the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field mechanism of
every MIME part is "binary"

There are several requirements like this.
 Is the purpose behind this to allow a service to have more flexibility
than the client, which might be constrained?  

If so we should probably say this up front
so people don't view this as an inconsistency.

Proposed Resolution (changes in red):

Clarify
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →