← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
New Issue: Purpose behind dup requirements?
Please defer discussions on this issue until a time this issue is accepted and is assigned a number. Description: Document: DPWS Version 1.0 Line number: Line 245 Owner: Scott de Deugd Description: Editorial: Section 3.6 says: R0036: A SERVICE MAY reject a MIME SOAP ENVELOPE if the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field mechanism of any MIME part is not "binary". R0037: A SERVICE MUST NOT send a MIME SOAP ENVELOPE unless the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field mechanism of every MIME part is "binary" There are several requirements like this. Is the purpose behind this to allow a service to have more flexibility than the client, which might be constrained? If so we should probably say this up front so people don't view this as an inconsistency. Proposed Resolution (changes in red): Clarify
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →