RE: Issue 104 - WS-Discovery - clarify case where a TS doesn'tspecify a Type

Hi all,

 

This issue was moved to pending during the face-to-face and I
was asked to incorporate appropriate text in the specification. I have applied
the resolution of this issue to my working draft. Following are the concrete
changes in the specification. Please review and let me know if you have any
questions or comments.

 

In the section that describes the normative outline for Hello the
following text (in Red) has been added.

 

Original Text:

/s:Envelope/s:Body/*/d:Types

Unordered set of Types implemented by the Target Service
(or Discovery Proxy). 

·        
For
a Target Service, if omitted or empty, no implied value. In a managed mode, all
supported Types SHOULD be included.

·        
For
a Discovery Proxy, MUST be included and MUST explicitly include d:DiscoveryProxy.

 

Modified Text:

/s:Envelope/s:Body/*/d:Types

Unordered set of Types implemented by the Target Service
(or Discovery Proxy). 

·        
For
a Target Service, if omitted or empty, no implied value. A Target Service MAY omit
Types due to security and message size considerations. In a managed mode, all supported
Types SHOULD be included.

·        
For
a Discovery Proxy, MUST be included and MUST explicitly include d:DiscoveryProxy.

 

Vipul

 

From: Ram Jeyaraman
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:17 AM

To: 

Subject: [ws-dd] Issue 104 - WS-Discovery - clarify case where a TS
doesn't specify a Type

 

This
issue is assigned the number 104. For further discussions on this issue, please
refer to this issue number or use this thread.

From: Alain Regnier
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:20 PM

To: Ram Jeyaraman

Subject: NEW Issue - Discovery - clarify case where a TS doesn't specify
a Type

 

Please defer discussions on this issue until a time this issue is
accepted and is assigned a number. 

Description:

In wd-04 line 490 (4.1 Hello): It may not be obvious in the
current text why a TS could ommit to specify a Type.

Proposed Resolution:

Add a simple clarification/example of why we could have a
TS putting an empty or no Type.