Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes

From
Doug Davis <>
Date
2005-08-20T14:19:28+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
 It looks good - thanks for the effort!

-Doug

Anish Karmarkar <>

08/16/2005 04:26 PM

To

Gilbert Pilz <>

cc



Subject

Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version
of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes

Attached are the .sxw and .pdf versions with fixes
for 'wsrm:' as 

pointed out by Gil.

-Anish

--

PS: we really need a CVS soon (instead of passing of files in emails).

Gilbert Pilz wrote:

> W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when
an element name

> is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things
like

> "Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not
to things like

> "Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage".
Any reason for this?

> 

> Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered
to

> be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I
wonder

> if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these
things out?

> 

> - g

> 

> 

>>-----Original Message-----

>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:] 

>>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM

>>To: 

>>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed
fixes

>>

>>Editors,

>>

>>I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of 

>>stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This 

>>was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards 

>>the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix 

>>it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will 

>>know what I'm talking about ;-)

>>

>>1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors 

>>that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes 

>>(with change tracking turned on).

>>2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues, 

>>which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send 

>>them in a subsequent email.

>>3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send 

>>those to the TC list.

>>

>>Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that 

>>I've made.

>>

>>Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get 

>>a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes 

>>include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font 

>>changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed. 

>>oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the 

>>'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com 

>>to 'example.com' etc.

>>

>>I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted 

>>us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by 

>>the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc 

>>to the TC site and get approval from the TC.

>>

>>Comments?

>>

>>-Anish

>>--

>>

>>

> 

> 

[attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.sxw" deleted
by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.pdf"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]