I though if you "Add a revision", it will both replace the
previous version (only one listing on the page) as well as keep the
previous copy in the system.
Thanks,
Sanjay
From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, Sep 16, 2005 16:25
PM
To: Doug Davis;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028
I suggest that we put the URL as TBD on to the docs we
post. We need to come up with a solution at the time when we publish a
committee draft I reckon.
I have another issue with the versions of the drafts. Are
we going to add separate docs for the draft versions or "replace" the previous
version? If the do the former it is easy to see the previous docs/pdf but it
takes hell of a space on the page. I deferred publishing the original
document and the new version (pending corrections with issues closed) until I
hear from the rest of you.
Thanks,
--umit
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, Sep 16, 2005 2:31 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028
You're right. Attached is
a new version with the correct doc id. Don't know about the url issue.
For now I was just going to add it to the website and people could get
to it from the list of docs.
thanks,
-Doug
"Yalcinalp, Umit"
<>
09/16/2005 04:50 PM
To
Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
<>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028
Doug,
I have not had the time to look at
your changes yet, however I noticed one thing right away that the document
identifier in the version you sent needs to be fixed.
I was going to
ask you guys your opinion about what the Location URL should be. This is
perhaps an issue which is not in the issue list, but needs to be resolved.
Currently, no one will be able to download the actual document using the
location identifier.
Thoughts?
--umit
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Sep 15, 2005 5:52 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028
Here's a new version of the spec with the changes
from the Close() proposal. I used Anish's version that he sent on 8/16
as the basis. This included all of his minor editorial changes.
Please give it a quick scan. I'm pretty sure the text itself is
ok but if someone can double check my schema and wsdl changes I'd appreciate
it. If everyone is ok with this I'd like to post it to the web site
soon (like maybe tomorrow night) to allow people the maximum amount of time
to use it for new issues.
Note - I renamed it to ws-03
thanks
-Doug
