I noticed we have yet another nit to deal with. The w3c docs are xml
based, they are a pain in the butt but yyyy/mm, document status kind of
entities can be automatically included to the document as one is going
to publish them.
We don't have a solution to this with .sxw, do we?
--umit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, Sep 19, 2005 5:33 PM
> To: Doug Davis
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
>
> This exactly why we really really really need CVS, now.
> The reason I did not change it (although it was trivial to do so) was
> because I did not want to update the website for such a small
> change and
> I did not want to prevent other editors from making a
> (different) change
> to the document (write-after-write).
>
> I guess, till we have a CVS we'll have to live with such an
> arrangement.
> Sigh!
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Doug Davis wrote:
> >
> > Already have a fix for this - just removed the extension from the
> > filename. I didn't update the file on the website 'cause I've been
> > updating it too much today and was waiting for a more
> significant change
> > :-)
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > *Anish Karmarkar <>*
> >
> > 09/19/2005 07:44 PM
> >
> >
> > To
> > "Patil, Sanjay" <>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Can we add this as an Action Item in the WS-RX Editors SC?
> > I don't have the permission (I assume, since I don't see the 'add
> > Action' button) to do so. Can you add this or give me the
> right permissions?
> >
> > This AI list can serve as our TODO list. Once we have enuf of these
> > things, we can generate a new draft periodically OR roll it in with
> > other substantial changes/issue resolution.
> >
> > I can fix this, but don't want to generate too may draft
> that would make
> > it hard for everyone to track. Which reminds me: we really
> need the CVS.
> > IIRC, we were only going to wait for a few weeks for OASIS
> to get its
> > act together (and it hasn't). Else we were planning on using
> > sourceforge. Not having CVS is very frustrating. What's the
> status on
> > resolving the IPR/legal issues (if any) wrt using sourceforge?
> >
> > -Anish
> > --
> >
> >
> > Patil, Sanjay wrote:
> > > The footer note in the pdf document reads - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sanjay
> >
>
