Re: [ws-rx-editors] Division of labor

I agree, let's just sign up as each
of us has free time.

-Doug

Anish Karmarkar <>

09/01/2005 06:34 PM

To

"Yalcinalp, Umit"
<>

cc



Subject

Re: [ws-rx-editors] Division
of labor

Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:

> 

> I forgot to mention this in my previous message.

> 

> How do you guys want to divide the labor going forward? I only have

> interest in dealing with issues wrt to Policy doc as I have indicated
in 

> a previous email. For example, I volunteer to take on the resolving
001.

> 

I'm flexible on division of labor.

For the wsrx spec I would like to suggest that we *not* have one person

assigned per section(s), rather pick up work as it trickles in based on

availability/round-robin/volunteers/whatever. Not doing so may result in

the document looking like it has been written by multiple authors 

(perhaps in this case, it may end up not mattering that much, since we

have a well-defined input spec with a narrowly defined charter. But this

would depend on the extend of the changes made by the TC).

Thoughts?

-Anish

--