RE: [ws-rx-editors] updated spec + i019 and i028

Maybe this was already answered but I don’t
immediately see a response. It is not true that adding a document with the same
name keeps the url the same. It is actually a huge pain that it doesn’t,
I’d prefer to give a url for a specific version and have one be the
latest like at W3C but that is not how Kavi works. Kavi creates an id for each
document revision that becomes part of the url. So every time you update a doc
there you get a new url, same name or not.

 

From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:] 

Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005
6:01 PM

To: Patil, Sanjay; Doug Davis;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028

 

Yes, you are correct. 

 

However, there is a problem. The
document name stays the same. My understanding/assumption was that we
will have individual URLs and identifiers that reflect the version numbers.
This is easily solved with the cvs, but not here. It is one of the things that
Paul Cotton wanted to have, if i understood him correctly at the concall. In
order to use the replace mechanism, we need a stable name which does not make
sense. Wouldn't you agree? 

 

Here is what I will do. I will post the
original and second version as two different urls. 

 

--umit

 

 

From: Patil,
Sanjay 

Sent: Friday, Sep 16, 2005 5:17 PM

To: Yalcinalp, Umit; Doug Davis;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028

 

I though if you "Add a
revision", it will both replace the previous version (only one listing on
the page) as well as keep the previous copy in the system.

 

Thanks,

Sanjay

 

From:
Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, Sep 16, 2005 16:25
PM

To: Doug Davis;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028

I suggest that we put the URL as TBD on to
the docs we post. We need to come up with a solution at the time when we
publish a committee draft I reckon. 

 

I have another issue with the versions of
the drafts. Are we going to add separate docs for the draft versions or
"replace" the previous version? If the do the former it is easy to
see the previous docs/pdf but it takes hell  of a space on the page. I
deferred publishing the original document and the new version (pending
corrections with issues closed) until I hear from the rest of you. 

 

Thanks, 

 

--umit

 

 

From: Doug
Davis [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, Sep 16, 2005 2:31 PM

To: 

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
updated spec + i019 and i028

You're right.  Attached is a new version with the
correct doc id.  Don't know about the url issue.  For now I was just
going to add it to the website and people could get to it from the list of
docs. 

thanks,

-Doug

 

  
  
"Yalcinalp, Umit"
  <> 

  
09/16/2005 04:50 PM 

  
  
  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
    <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
 

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: [ws-rx-editors] updated spec + i019 and
    i028

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    
 

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

Doug, 

  

I have not had the time to look at your changes yet, however
I noticed one thing right away that the document identifier in the version you
sent needs to be fixed. 

  

I was going to ask you guys your opinion about what the
Location URL should be. This is perhaps an issue which is not in the issue
list, but needs to be resolved. Currently, no one will be able to download the
actual document using the location identifier. 

  

Thoughts? 

  

--umit 

  

From: Doug Davis
[mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, Sep 15, 2005 5:52 PM

To: 

Subject: [ws-rx-editors] updated spec + i019 and i028

Here's a new version of the spec with the changes from the Close() proposal.  I
used Anish's version that he sent on 8/16 as the basis.  This included all
of his minor editorial changes.  Please give it a quick scan.  I'm
pretty sure the text itself is ok but if someone can double check my schema and
wsdl changes I'd appreciate it.  If everyone is ok with this I'd like to
post it to the web site soon (like maybe tomorrow night) to allow people the
maximum amount of time to use it for new issues. 

Note - I renamed it to ws-03 

thanks 

-Doug