Sure.
One correction inlined below.
-Anish
--
Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Can the editors please be prepared to give an update on the CD on this
> Thursday's conference call.
>
> Paul
>
>
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>
>> As you may have seen I checked in drafts to fix issues i017, i045 and
>> i046. For 17, I picked 200510 as the 'YYYYMM'.
>>
>> +1 to waiting to have a fix for i024.
>>
>> I think we are done wrt wsrm doc based on the issues that Paul sent.
>> Thanks Dug for doing the heavy lifting.
>>
>> Here is a summary (of the issues that Paul sent out) for the WSRM doc:
>>
>> 1) Closed issues that require no change to the doc --
>> 3, 4, 12, 14, 18, 26
>>
>> 2) Issues that do require action and should now be 'editors - done' --
>> 5, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 27, 28, 20, 25, 29, 31, 33, 34, 39, 40
>>
>> 3) New proposed issues --
>> NewProposed01 (issue i036) closed with no action
>> Proposed04 (issue i036) done
proposed04 is now i039 (not i036).
-Anish
--
>> Proposed05 (issue i040) done
>> Proposed11 (issue i045) done
>> Proposed12 (issue i046) done
>>
>> -Anish
>> --
>>
>> Doug Davis wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Editors,
>>> I think the only one left is: i024 - didn't do because I wanted the
>>> TC to agree on Ashok's text first.
>>> and haven't looked at the 'proposed' issues yet.
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Paul Fremantle <>*
>>>
>>> 09/25/2005 07:03 PM
>>> Please respond to
>>> paul
>>>
>>>
>>> To
>>> cc
>>>
>>> Subject
>>> [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Editors
>>>
>>> Here is my figuring on what needs to go into the Committee Draft:
>>>
>>> Issues resolved up to and including the F2F to be included in CD
>>> ================================================================
>>>
>>> Issues closed, 4, 12, 14, 18
>>>
>>> Issues requiring editor input from F2F
>>> ======================================
>>>
>>> i001 Bilateral sequence negotiation
>>> i005 Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received
>>> i011 Typo in expires P0S
>>> i013 Max message number in policy
>>> i015 Required Artifact Metadata
>>> i016 Document Identifiers
>>> i017 XML Namespace URIs
>>> i019 Sequence termination on Fault
>>> i027 InOrder delivery assurance spanning multiple sequences
>>> i028 Accurate final acknowledgement of a Sequence with gaps when
>>> RMS decides to stop using it
>>>
>>> Issues resolved at the Seattle F2F
>>> ==================================
>>>
>>> Issue 20 - meaning of at most once DA
>>> Issue 9 - policy assertion for Delivery Assurance.
>>> While this doesn't make HUGE amounts of sense without the text
>>> describing where it goes, I suggest we add it to the document - which is
>>> what the vote agreed
>>>
>>> Issue 26 - space greedy. Closed
>>> Issue 24 - Observed text.
>>> Issue 25 - Seqack when no messages received.
>>> Issue 29 - Security Token Reference removed
>>> Issue 3 - Close, no action
>>> Issue 25 - Sequence ack where no messages received
>>> Issue 31 - Schema inconsistency
>>> Issue 33 - NACK processing
>>> Issue 34 - Faults on piggybacking
>>>
>>> NewProposed01 - DuplicateDetection of CSMs - closed no action
>>>
>>> Edits from Seattle F2F agreed as Action Items
>>> ======================================
>>> Proposed04
>>> Proposed05
>>> Proposed11
>>> Proposed12
>>>
>>>
>>> Proposed13 is NOT to be in CD (so as to minimise change bars)
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Fremantle
>>> Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology
>>> WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform"
>>>
>>> Yahoo IM: paulfremantle
>>> Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729
>>> Fax: +1 360 485-4275
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
