Title: References
Not from me, good call.
From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005
10:39 AM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
References
Folks,
After
Marc's comment, I went through both of the documents and found out that there
is inconsistency as to how references are classified non-normative vs.
normative.
Initially,
I classified all the references in the policy document as non-normative with
the intent that the tc will make a decision. After thinking through, I think
that this issue should be discussed with the tc, instead of making an editorial
decision as the decision may not be editorial. (Marc, you raised this and I
would like to take this to the tc at this point).
I
looked at the WS-RM document itself has listed all the references as normative
except policy related ones as non-normative. So, I am not sure how certain
references are blessed to be normative and some of them are not non-normative,
such as WS-Policy. I don't recall making a decision about them.
I
think before we start moving references from one section to another, the tc
needs to determine, just like WS-Addressing reference to use which references
are normative, which are not normative, etc. As editors we can always make a
proposal, but I would rather get this recorded.
Any
opinions before I publish the issue to the tc?
--umit
