I like the categorization as well.
I believe the list allows it, but Marc is the authorative answer. If it
does not, it should be enabled.
--umit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Sunday, Oct 02, 2005 10:17 PM
> To: Marc Goodner
> Cc: Yalcinalp, Umit;
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets
> in the issues list
>
> +1
>
> Does the list allow the an issue to have a target of 'wsrm'
> *and* wsrmp?
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Marc Goodner wrote:
> > Sure, changing the targets to mean an actual deliverable
> makes a lot
> > more sense. This was another carryover from the source
> schema I used for
> > the issue list. They seemed more conceptual than related to actual
> > deliverables.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here would be my proposed list:
> >
> > * wsrm
> > * wsrm-schema
> > * wsrm-wsdl
> > * wsrmp
> > * wsrmp-schema
> >
> >
> >
> > Am I missing anything or does that look right?
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, if an issue is the schema or wsdl has an error the target is
> > obvious. If the issue involves a change to the spec that
> impacts the
> > schema or wsdl it seems that we don't need to log that in
> the target. I
> > would trust the editors would see the connection without
> having both the
> > spec and the schema tagged as a target in such cases.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >
> > *From:* Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:]
> > *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2005 2:14 PM
> > *To:* Marc Goodner
> > *Cc:*
> > *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] Request for updating the targets in the
> > issues list
> >
> >
> >
> > Marc,
> >
> > Would you be able to update the targets in the issues list
> with more
> > meaningful references? What we label is core is not really
> "core" per
> > se. I would prefer to get the deliverables represented as
> the targets so
> > that we can keep track of our work.
> >
> > For example Issue 001 relates to the policy spec, ditto
> i013, i016/17
> > apply to both targets...
> >
> > It is easier to keep track of the changes that way.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --umit
> >
> >
> >
>
