The CD's will have a name change, for example, the "wd"
would be replaced by "cd". We should perhaps also add a status section in the
doc, but I would like to discuss this in the TC.
Basically, the CD will be a new instance and can be put in
a new folder. Any major issues with this?
Thanks,
Sanjay
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 14:46
PM
To: Patil, Sanjay; Gilbert Pilz;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need
to clean up the TC Document page
Where would you
suppose the previous versions go? Moving them by copy and delete would have a
negative impact on links from places like the issue list. I’m afraid the way
Kavi works once you put something somewhere you need to leave
there.
From: Patil,
Sanjay [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:42
PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need to
clean up the TC Document page
I think it's a good
idea and we may not have to consult the TC just for deciding a folder for the
CDs. But can we wait until tomorrow which is when the ballot for CD closes and
CDs would be officially
born (hopefully).
Thanks,
sanjay
From:
Gilbert Pilz [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 14:32
PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] Need to clean
up the TC Document page
Not sure if this is an "editors
issue" or a "TC issue" but the TC Document page is getting kind of crufty.
Its hard to figure out which document is which when you look at the page.
Leaving the other folder aside for the moment, I think the "Editors Drafts"
folder should only contain the following:
1.) latest WDs of wsrm and wsrmp
as published by the editors
2.) diffs of the lastest WD
against the previous document (WD or CD)
I think the Committee Drafts
should be placed in their own folder. This folder should
contain
1.) the latest CDs of wsrm and
wsrmp as approved by the TC
2.) diffs of the latest CD
against the previous CD or submission
document
Comments?
If we decide to do this, do we
need the TCs approval or can the chairs just ok
it?
-
g
