+1
We should adapt the boiler plate to reflects our
realities.
Thanks,
Sanjay
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Oct 27, 2005 22:13
PM
To: Paul Fremantle; Patil, Sanjay; James Bryce
Clark
Cc:
Subject: RE:
[ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01
Importance:
High
The boilerplate being
used for the cover page of this CD is wrong. There is information there that
is inaccurate and in my opinion misleading. It should not be applied on the
grounds that it is in the OASIS templates/samples and in other TC
CDs.
The primary problem
is the public review link. The TC did not approve this CD for public review.
That link simply should not be in this CD.
I specifically asked
if this was a public review and was repeatedly told no. It has been emphasized
on our calls that this was not going to be up for public review. Insisting on
this link because it is part of the boilerplate seems wrong to me. I don’t
think any editorial comment about that link not being monitored or the TC not
accepting public comment at this time could be strong enough. Why would you
give someone the link if they are not supposed to use it? It certainly implies
that the TC will be taking comments on this CD at some point in time which is
contrary to the direction we were given.
Furthermore the
comment form does not seem like it should be there if the TC has not released
a CD for public review yet. Currently the form seems to be active but the
links to the archive itself do not function. Who even monitors mail sent to
this alias?
I am less concerned
about the errata link. Again though, I just don’t understand why we would put
boilerplate text with a link to a document we never intend to produce in a CD.
Look, boilerplate is
boilerplate. Why are we insisting on inserting information into our first CD
that is wrong because it is part of a template. If it doesn’t apply it doesn’t
apply. Strike it.
Wsrm:
Remove this text from
lines 36 – 38:
Others should use
the comment form at http://www.oasisopen.
org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx.
[ed.
note - Comments are
not
being accepted at this time.]
Remove lines 43 –
45
If necessary, the
errata page for this version of of the specification will be located
at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/documents/errata/1.1/index.html.
[ed.
note –
There
is no errata at this time.]
Wsrmp:
Remove this text from
lines 29 – 31:
Others should use
the comment form at http://www.oasisopen.
org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx.
[ed.
note - Comments are
not
being accepted at this time.]
Remove lines 36 –
38
If necessary, the
errata page for this version of of the specification will be located
at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-rx/documents/errata/1.1/index.html.
[ed.
note –
There
is no errata at this time.]
From: Marc
Goodner [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:59
PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01
PDF for both
please.
From: Gilbert
Pilz [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:16
PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-01
Same deal for WS-RM
Policy.
-
g
