I moved wd-05 to a different folder ("Closed Editors
Drafts" or some such) in the interests of keeping our main folder clean and
making it easier for people to find the right document to work on. Kavi sends
out notices that give no indication that the document has simply been
moved.
+1 to one working draft the week before the F2F. The
problem is we have to define a cut-off point for the changes that will go into
that WD. That cut-off point has to allow us enough time to make and (what takes
even more time) to review those changes. Umit has suggested Dec 1st. Does
anybody have any objections to that date?
We can discuss what to do after the F2F at
the F2F.
- g
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005
4:22 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
I’m confused on this
in relation to the auto notice we go earlier about the pending changes applied
to wd-05. Also, why are those applied as wd-05 instead of as a new document
with a ed status or at least a incremented revision number?
I’ll take a look at
this as well if a pdf is available in advance. Don’t worry about it after 6 as
I’ve got a meeting until 9 at that point.
Do we have any plans
on when working drafts will be made available to the TC other than this
immediate reordering? There aren’t a whole lot of weeks left before the F2F.
I’m wondering if it makes sense to just shoot for one WD say the week before
the F2F and task someone in the TC to review the pending change list and
report back at the F2F.
After the F2F is the
plan to roll up all remaining pending changes and produce a WD to put on the
ballot for the 2nd CD? The original schedule called for the
2nd CD in December, is that still realistic or are we out to
January since the F2F is so close to the
holidays?
From: Gilbert
Pilz [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:04
PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] Publishing
wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
At the last F2F we agreed that we
would do the following:
1.) publish the
CD
2.) re-order the sub-sections per
Doug's suggestion
3.) re-publish the new
WD
Nobody said anything about making
any other changes in step (3). In the spirit of following the directions of
the TC I think we should publish wsrm-1.1-spec-wd06 (warts and all) and
address the various editorial flaws in
wd-07.
The link to wd-06 is: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/15194/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06.sxw.
Doug has already looked this over and approved it. If I don't hear any
objections to doing so, I will publish this link (along with the diffs from
cd-01) to the main TC page some time late
tonight.
-
g
