Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [ws-rx-editors] Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06

From
Paul Cotton <>
Date
2005-11-17T21:54:08+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx-editors] Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
It sounds like OO is doing a lousy job of
producing its diffs if it does this.  But thanks for the detailed response.  I
certainly appreciate it.

 

/paulc

 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada

17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3

Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329

mailto:

 

From: Gilbert Pilz
[mailto:] 

Sent: November 17, 2005 4:41 PM

To: Paul
 Cotton; 

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06

 

Paul,

 

I have to admit that I don't fully
understand the behavior of OO when comparing files with substantial changes
between them. For example, bot wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-01 and wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06 have
6 subsections under chapter 3, yet the diff file has sub-sections 3.7 and 3.8
meanwhile sub-section 3.1 is completely empty. I suspect that what happened was
that the original text (from cd-01) of:

 

/wsrm:CloseSequence/{any}

   
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow different (extensible) types of
information, based on a schema, to be passed.

 

/wsrm:CloseSequence@{any}

   
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional attributes, based on
schemas, to be added to the element.

 

was compared (for whatever
reason) with the text (from wd-06):

 

/wsrm:AckRequested/{any}

   
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow different (extensible) types of
information, based on a schema, to be passed.

 

/wsrm:AckRequested@{any}

   
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional attributes, based on
schemas, to be added to the element.

 

it genereated the fragment that you
noticed.

 

W/respect to the discussion on the con-call
today, I'm going to fix the date on ws-06 and publish it and the diffs to the
main TC page today.

 

- g

From: Paul Cotton [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005
3:04 PM

To: Gilbert Pilz;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06

I looked at this and a big part of 3.7 is
marked as deleted but there appears to be a fragment of this section remaining.
 See lines 807-808.

 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada

17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3

Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329

mailto:

 

From: Gilbert Pilz
[mailto:] 

Sent: November 15, 2005 11:40 PM

To: Gilbert Pilz; 

Cc: Paul
 Cotton

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06

 

I've attached the files I'm going to
publish. If you review them you will notice that there are more changes flagged
than just those outlined in the resolution of i047. This is due to the fact
that I fixed one editorial nit (double spaces) before Doug convinced me that we
should stick to a strict interpretation of step (2) below. I know its a bit
confusing, but putting back a bunch of double spaces is both tedious and a
waste of time. Just consider it a preview of all the nits to come . . .

 

- g

 

From: Gilbert
Pilz 

Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005
2:04 PM

To:


Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06

At the last F2F we agreed that we would do the following:

 

1.) publish the CD

2.) re-order the sub-sections per Doug's suggestion

3.) re-publish the new WD

 

Nobody said anything about making any other changes in step
(3). In the spirit of following the directions of the TC I think we should
publish wsrm-1.1-spec-wd06 (warts and all) and address the various editorial
flaws in wd-07.

 

The link to wd-06 is: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/15194/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06.sxw.
Doug has already looked this over and approved it. If I don't hear any
objections to doing so, I will publish this link (along with the diffs from
cd-01) to the main TC page some time late tonight.

 

- g
Next in thread → Next in month →