I think OO 2.0 is much better. Is there any reason why we wouldn't
switch now?
-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 19:12 PM
To: Yalcinalp, Umit
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question
I don't know the bookmarks that you are talking about, but I remember
that Gil was pointing out that mailto URIs don't show up correctly in
PDF.
I generated the PDF using OOo 2.0 and the mailto URIs work correctly in
the generated PDF (didn't even have to change the .sxw format). I also
checked that with OOo 2.0, the reference points to the correct relative
URI reference (#whatever) for the correct reference entry.
I'm quite happy with OOo 2.0, so far.
-Anish
--
Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is an OO question. I recall that Gil was complaining that the
> references to the "References" in the specs were not preserved when
PDF
> is created.
>
> I noticed the way that refs are created are via using bookmarks in OO,
> not inserting reference fields/reference values. Does anyone know why
> this is done via bookmarks, but not actual references?
>
> It may be a mute point for PDF as neither of the formats work to get
> hyperlinks from pdf, either.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --umit
>
>
