Don't care when we do it - as long as
we all do it at the same time.
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <>
12/22/2005 10:19 PM
To
"Winkler, Steve"
<>
cc
"Yalcinalp, Umit"
<>,
Subject
Re: [ws-rx-editors] References
vs. bookmarks? OO question
+1
-Anish
--
Winkler, Steve wrote:
> I think OO 2.0 is much better. Is there any reason why we wouldn't
> switch now?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, Dec 22, 2005 19:12 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] References vs. bookmarks? OO question
>
> I don't know the bookmarks that you are talking about, but I remember
> that Gil was pointing out that mailto URIs don't show up correctly
in
> PDF.
>
> I generated the PDF using OOo 2.0 and the mailto URIs work correctly
in
> the generated PDF (didn't even have to change the .sxw format). I
also
> checked that with OOo 2.0, the reference points to the correct relative
> URI reference (#whatever) for the correct reference entry.
>
> I'm quite happy with OOo 2.0, so far.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
>
>>Folks,
>>
>>This is an OO question. I recall that Gil was complaining that
the
>>references to the "References" in the specs were not
preserved when
>
> PDF
>
>>is created.
>>
>>I noticed the way that refs are created are via using bookmarks
in OO,
>
>
>>not inserting reference fields/reference values. Does anyone know
why
>>this is done via bookmarks, but not actual references?
>>
>>It may be a mute point for PDF as neither of the formats work to
get
>>hyperlinks from pdf, either.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>--umit
>>
>>
