A web interface to modify the values
of the list would be best - but I think that might be pushing the boundaries
of Kavi's hi-techness :-)
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<>
12/01/2005 07:46 PM
To
"Anish Karmarkar"
<>, <>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors] Pending
Issues for the WSRMP document and plan
Well what do you know. We may have a use for an attribute
I never use in
the issue list, edstatus. If we start using that with an alternate xsl
it would be just what we need. However, that would require each editor
to update the issue list accordingly. That would be a lot easier if we
could update the issue list without a man in the middle approach.
Not that Robin isn't responsive, I just don't want to abuse his
kindness.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:34 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Pending Issues for the WSRMP document and
plan
Yes, that would great, as long as it is ok with you if the editors
update the status once they are done with a particular issue.
-Anish
--
Marc Goodner wrote:
> Would a different view of the issue list help? We could put together
an
> alternative stylesheet to use if that presents a more useful view
of
it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:06 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Pending Issues for the WSRMP document
and
> plan
>
> I do have cycles in the coming days and can work on the drafts (feel
bad
>
> for not being able to work on them for the past 2 weeks or so).
>
> Can we create a editors' TODO list (unless folks think that this is
too
> much trouble than it is worth)? This would speed up task allocation
as
> well as ensure that we don't miss anything that the TC has agreed
on.
>
> I would be more than happy to maintain the TODO list.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -Anish
> --
>
>
> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
>
>>Folks,
>>
>>Sorry about the delay in sending this out. I wrote the email last
>
> night,
>
>>but has been sitting in my drafts folder :-(.
>>
>>Based on my conversation with Gil today, he will do some tidying
up in
>
>
>>the wsrmp wd 02 (editors area) tomorrow.
>>
>>I have the following pending issues that need to be integrated
>>
>>I022
>>I024
>>I054
>>I072
>>I073
>>I074
>>
>>I will not be able to work on anything until Friday, unfortunately.
>
> This
>
>>is a bad week overall.
>>
>>I would be happy to do a sweep regarding parameters that span multiple
>
>
>>issues. Gil, would you be able to check in the updates by Friday
>>morning, if at all possible and can you let me know which issues
you
>>were planning to address in the editing.
>>
>>I promise to post the changes to next Tuesday. This should give
ample
>>opportunity to review the spec by next Thursday for sanity and
we can
>>post a copy to the tc. This gives the tc a week to read the spec
prior
>
>
>>to the f2f.
>>
>>Would this plan be acceptable to everyone? If any of you have cycles
>
> to
>
>>work on the closing the issues this week, that is great. Just let
me
>>know. Otherwise, I will stick to the plan outlined and let the
tc
>
> know.
>
>>Apologies for the late notice.
>>
>>--umit
>>
>>
>>----------------------
>>
>>Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
>>Standards Architect
>>NetWeaver Industry Standards
>>SAP Labs, LLC
>>
>>Tel: (650) 320-3095
>>
