RE: [ws-rx-editors] Pending Issues for the WSRMP document and plan

From
Doug Davis <>
Date
2005-12-01T20:32:08+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx-editors] Pending Issues for the WSRMP document and plan
I would love it if there was something
we could check to indicate that an editor completed the issue.  then
our todo list would be the uncheck ones.

-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <>
wrote on 12/01/2005 03:28:47 PM:

> Would a different view of the issue list help? We could put together
an

> alternative stylesheet to use if that presents a more useful view
of it.

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:] 

> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:06 PM

> To: Yalcinalp, Umit

> Cc: 

> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Pending Issues for the WSRMP document
and

> plan

> 

> I do have cycles in the coming days and can work on the drafts (feel
bad

> 

> for not being able to work on them for the past 2 weeks or so).

> 

> Can we create a editors' TODO list (unless folks think that this is
too 

> much trouble than it is worth)? This would speed up task allocation
as 

> well as ensure that we don't miss anything that the TC has agreed
on.

> 

> I would be more than happy to maintain the TODO list.

> 

> What do you think?

> 

> -Anish

> --

> 

> 

> Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:

> > Folks,

> > 

> > Sorry about the delay in sending this out. I wrote the email
last

> night, 

> > but has been sitting in my drafts folder :-(.

> > 

> > Based on my conversation with Gil today, he will do some tidying
up in

> 

> > the wsrmp wd 02 (editors area) tomorrow.

> > 

> > I have the following pending issues that need to be integrated

> > 

> > I022

> > I024

> > I054

> > I072

> > I073

> > I074

> > 

> > I will not be able to work on anything until Friday, unfortunately.

> This 

> > is a bad week overall.

> > 

> > I would be happy to do a sweep regarding parameters that span
multiple

> 

> > issues. Gil, would you be able to check in the updates by Friday

> > morning, if at all possible and can you let me know which issues
you 

> > were planning to address in the editing.

> > 

> > I promise to post the changes to next Tuesday. This should give
ample 

> > opportunity to review the spec by next Thursday for sanity and
we can 

> > post a copy to the tc. This gives the tc a week to read the spec
prior

> 

> > to the f2f.

> > 

> > Would this plan be acceptable to everyone? If any of you have
cycles

> to 

> > work on the closing the issues this week, that is great. Just
let me 

> > know. Otherwise, I will stick to the plan outlined and let the
tc

> know. 

> > 

> > Apologies for the late notice.

> > 

> > --umit

> > 

> > 

> > ----------------------

> > 

> > Dr. Umit Yalcinalp

> > Standards Architect

> > NetWeaver Industry Standards

> > SAP Labs, LLC

> > 

> > Tel: (650) 320-3095

> >